

I would imagine that a good one will cost a decent amount of $$. Equation writers are NOT simple pieces of software. I would recommend just biting the bullet and learning LaTeX. I just need something I can install fire up and use, with approximately zero time and complexity. Other than that I'm slightly stuffed - should I switch over to Bootcamp every time I need to send my tutor a question to request his help with it? Are there any better or easier options for Windows anyway? Not when I have an assignment due in in 3 days. I tried to get my head around straightforward instructions on how to install and use LaTex - but I don't have time any more like I used to in the old days to spend a day working through a whole fistful of command line options and pages of dense Unix type manuals and reading forum posts about what went wrong and how to fix it. Or perhaps it just happens on my particular computer? Anyway the copy and paste thing is real enough. I can't remember what the specific problem was, but I was trying to represent an electron in a nuclear reaction (basic decay stuff, nothing very advanced), and it just wouldn't work properly. Like when you had a bunch of chemical notations, with superscript and subscript, it all got a bit jumbled up and messy. I'm not because there was a problem with formatting certain in-line equations together. There isn?t a lot about this subject, but obviously the answer is on Google lol That?s what I did back then to find the trick with Grapher, and to find MathType. What?s wrong other than that in Office 2011, according to you?Ībsolutely. But I think it still keeps a LaTeX form if it?s Office 2011, so it?s not bad. But if you?re going to copy and paste them in an email (which I?m wondering why you?re not simply joining the word document), obviously you?re losing the editor. Office 2011 is actually very well designed. This is an insult to all scientists out there.

I was pretty sure you were talking about Office 2008 for Mac, because now, this sucks in an inunderstandable way.
